<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Orkut filters sexually-explicit photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.enlighten3d.com/2008/10/28/googles-orkut-filters-sexually-explicit-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.enlighten3d.com/2008/10/28/googles-orkut-filters-sexually-explicit-photos/</link>
	<description>An expert blog on computer vision and 3D graphics</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Koopferstock</title>
		<link>http://www.enlighten3d.com/2008/10/28/googles-orkut-filters-sexually-explicit-photos/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Koopferstock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enlighten3d.com/?p=204#comment-219</guid>
		<description>A hard problem indeed, and one for which it is unlikely that computer vision will ever solve with 100% accuracy, if for no other reason than people in general are unable to fully agree on what content should be filtered and what is ok (comments on our Polar Rose article a few weeks ago confirm this).

That being said, a computer vision-based filter could be created that would work in enough cases (or, perhaps, in enough of the more "extreme" cases) that it would prove worthwhile to implement for a company like Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A hard problem indeed, and one for which it is unlikely that computer vision will ever solve with 100% accuracy, if for no other reason than people in general are unable to fully agree on what content should be filtered and what is ok (comments on our Polar Rose article a few weeks ago confirm this).</p>
<p>That being said, a computer vision-based filter could be created that would work in enough cases (or, perhaps, in enough of the more &#8220;extreme&#8221; cases) that it would prove worthwhile to implement for a company like Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://www.enlighten3d.com/2008/10/28/googles-orkut-filters-sexually-explicit-photos/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enlighten3d.com/?p=204#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Filtering out sexually explicit photos sounds like an interesting challenge and problem.  I wonder if it can detect the difference between a photo of a beautiful girl walking down the beach in a bikini vs. a photo of a stripper about to remove the last articles of clothing on stage?  Fascinating problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filtering out sexually explicit photos sounds like an interesting challenge and problem.  I wonder if it can detect the difference between a photo of a beautiful girl walking down the beach in a bikini vs. a photo of a stripper about to remove the last articles of clothing on stage?  Fascinating problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
